Abolish the Senate, move to single Parliament » Manila Bulletin News

Manila Bulletin Philippines

Breaking News from the Nation's leading newspaper


Online Newspaper

Showbiz and Celebrity News

Sports News

World News
News Asia

Abolish the Senate, move to single Parliament


By Getsy Tiglao

The unparliamentary brawl in the Senate between Senators Richard Gordon and Antonio Trillanes, only the latest in the endless drama being witnessed in the upper house, gives the people another reason to root for a shift to a parliamentary system with a single legislative body.

Gordon and Trillanes were fighting over whether or not to call the President’s son and son-in-law to the Blue Ribbon Committee hearing. Heated words were exchanged, threats of expulsion made, and taxpayers’ money was wasted. It’s absurd really. But this is the Philippine Senate, where everyone is auditioning to be the next president.

Meanwhile, the Philippines is struggling to play catch-up with its Asian neighbors who have all been enjoying the fruits of economic development and the stability that comes with their parliamentary form of government. We’re the only ones stuck in a colonial time warp, struggling with a flawed presidential system foisted on us by foreign subjugators.

Previous leaders of the country had tried to change to a parliamentary system, beginning with Marcos and then Ramos and Arroyo. But Filipinos weren’t ready then and mistrusted their leaders. It is only now under the immensely popular Duterte administration that the shift is finally happening.

If it were up to the Senate, there will be no major reforms that will be undertaken which will take time away from their favorite occupation, the committee hearings in aid of legislation. But why is it that we never hear of the important laws that are supposed to have been inspired by these hearings? All we are left with are the bitter taste of the bullying of witnesses and the senatorial infighting.

The Lower House, on the other hand, has been enjoying a renaissance of sorts with its newfound vigor and purpose. They don’t enjoy the same media attention bestowed on the senators but they are a hardworking lot led by House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez who, in his no-nonsense manner, is quietly pushing through with President Rodrigo Duterte’s major reform initiatives.

After passing the difficult comprehensive tax reform program (still pending in the Senate), the House and its technical group are now working on the initial draft of the new federal-parliamentary constitution, in preparation for discussions next year in the joint Constituent Assembly. I had discussed in last week’s column the merits of federalism, which will see the creation of 11 Philippine federal states.

A parliamentary system typically has only one legislative house. This means a faster, more efficient process of creating legislation. Our current system is too slow and ponderous. Debates in one house for a law is repeated in the other house. We will save a lot of money if one of these houses is eliminated.

The Philippine parliament as envisioned will be headed by a Prime Minister who will be chosen by his or her peers in the chamber. This means no extra elections that will use public funds. Also, if the people are unhappy with the Prime Minister, their representatives in parliament could easily remove the official through an in-house no-confidence vote.

Under the presidential system, the two houses of Congress are part and parcel of the idea of a “check and balance” in government. But in today’s polarized world, with politics often taking precedence over national interest, finding the balance is almost impossible. Even in a mature political environment such as the United States, major laws take time to pass, if at all, with partisanship mucking up reforms.

The growing consensus in the Duterte administration is to transition into a hybrid parliamentary system with a President who is head of state and the Prime Minister as head of government. Part of the plan is to give additional responsibilities to the President who will take charge of foreign affairs and national defense, as commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of the Philippines.

The members of Cabinet will come from the ranks of Congress, an easy fusion of the executive and legislative. This should lead to a better understanding of what laws are really needed by the people as the legislators-department heads are exposed to the real world. The President, our equivalent of a working monarch, will still be chosen via general election.

A proposal gaining traction is the elimination of the post of vice president which has been deemed useless and redundant. The new line of succession will see the head of the unicameral body as a temporary president, in case of death or resignation, until a new election for a president can be called.

This brings us to the crucial question – should the Philippine version of a Parliament retain both the Senate and the House of Representatives? Some parliamentary countries do support two chambers. This is the initial idea because the lawmakers are not expected to support any change in the constitution if they are not allowed to retain their current positions.

But this is utterly selfish, and the lawmakers should think of their country first. A unicameral parliament is the best for the Philippines. We need a more stable form of government since the one we have is an easy target for obstructionists and destabilizers. The people are tired of the partisan politics and constant drama. It’s time for the lawmakers to stop these and do some real work for a change.

Tags: , , , ,

Related Posts

  • Blackie Hawkie

    A single parliament is not adaptable at this point in time because Duterte is a tyrant and a dictator. He will just use the parliament for his own vested interests. Single parliament is applicable during the administration of FVR and Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo because they are good leaders.

    • jason

      a tyrant and dictator who signed “tyrannic orders” like FOI.

    • joshibeans

      Tyrant and a dictator according to who? Because for a great many, he’s the best thing to have happened in the country. Besides, as the article stated, it’s only now that a leader is enjoying this much support hence, will be effective in implementing changes.

    • Emman Hermann

      Dick-tator? If Duterte is a dictator and a tyrant, you will be arrested by posting this. Since there is none, your comment does not make any sense. Duterte is just a badass statesman, unlike your favorites because they are incompetent.

    • Sorry, I beg to disagree. Duterte is not a dictator. Have you ever seen him meddle with his cabinet? Much less in the three branches of government? Have you seen him meddle with the CA when it flagrantly denied an efficient cabinet member? Were there people arrested for criticising him? Does he even meddle in the PNP, the Armed Forces? If you really get down to the details, the impeachment complaints in the house were filed by people not connected with the President. And if you look closely, those impeachment complaints have meat in their bones. Something that the LP in the Senate would not bother to have just as long as they malign our country and the President. I say we go for a single parliament para yung mga epal sa both Houses eh isa nalang ang titiisin natin.

      • Nga pala, if he’s a tyrant, why was his FIRST executive order the FOI. Freedom of Information. Is this the actuation of a dictator? Why did he say GO to the 1k increase in senior citizen benefit sa SSS when Noynoy said HINDI PUEDE? Why is there FREE COLLEGE EDUCATION when a dictator usually would keep the populace ignorant? Why is he enjoying an 85% approval rating in ALL surveys?
        Something world leaders would die for? Shall I continue? Cuz there are hundred other things he’s doing for the country?