China likely to build more islands: Philippines » Manila Bulletin News

Manila Bulletin Philippines

Breaking News from the Nation's leading newspaper

Tempo

Online Newspaper

Showbiz and Celebrity News

Sports News

World News
News Asia

China likely to build more islands: Philippines

Published

By Agence France-Presse

Manila expects China to try to build on a reef off the Philippines’ coast, the country’s defense secretary said Tuesday, a move he said would be “unacceptable” in the flashpoint waterway.

Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana gestures during a press conference held at the Malacañang on February 7, 2017. The government has declared an all-out war against the New People's Army following President Rodrigo Duterte's pronouncement, Lorenzana said. The president has earlier labeled the Communist Party of the Philippines-National Democratic Front-New People's Army terrorists and has ordered the lifting of a unilateral ceasefire. (photo by Richard V. Viñas)

Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana gestures during a press conference held at the Malacañang on February 7, 2017.(photo by Richard V. Viñas)

In an interview with AFP, Delfin Lorenzana said he believed China would eventually reclaim the Scarborough Shoal, which sits just 230 kilometers (143 miles) from the main Philippine island of Luzon.

Beijing has already built up a number of islets and reefs in the South China Sea, installing military facilities on several of them.

Analysts say that similar installations on Scarborough Shoal could give China effective military control over the disputed waterway — something the US has said it is not prepared to accept.

“They encroached,” Lorenzana said of a 2012 confrontation that saw Philippine vessels displaced. “They occupied three islands there plus they are trying to get Scarborough. So to us that is unacceptable”.

“If we allow them, they will build. That’s very, very disturbing. Very much (more) disturbing than Fiery Cross because this is so close to us,” Lorenzana added, referring to one of the Philippine-claimed reefs China has built on.

Because of its position, another military outpost at Scarborough Shoal is seen as the last major physical step required to secure control of the sea.

An outpost at the shoal would also put Chinese fighter jets and missiles within easy striking distance of US forces stationed in the Philippines.

The shoal also commands the northeast exit of the sea, so a Chinese military outpost there could stop other countries’ navies from using the vital stretch of waters.

A UN-backed tribunal — in a case brought by Manila under then-president Benigno Aquino — ruled last year that the so-called “nine-dash-line” which underpins Beijing’s claim to most of the South China Sea had no legal basis.

But his successor, Rodrigo Duterte, has courted Beijing and backed away from his country’s close relationship with the United States.

Lorenzana said Chinese island-reclamation efforts were meant to control the South China Sea.

“That could be their strategy to counter any superpower that would encroach on South China Sea because they believe South China Sea is — that’s like their lake to them — theirs,” he added.

The administration of new US President Donald Trump has indicated it will push back against any Chinese attempt to solidify control of the sea.

During confirmation hearings, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the US would block Chinese access to the islands, although analysts have pointed out that this would require a military blockade — an act of war.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Posts

  • Jose Samilin

    True, there is a great possibility for China’s further encroachment. But could we blame PRRD’s excellent move to cool down the Region for imminent war between China and USA, expecting our country to be the very first target of nuke by China? No, of course!!

    Realizing the enormous advantage in preventing war, DU30 is in fact, had just bestowed you gifts to both of them, Vhina and USA!! But what is the use of the United Nations, a lame duck and incapable to provide solution on International disputes? If it doesn’t serve the purpose internationally, dismantle it, what else???

    Now just think about it, these powerful countries, will say, non-sense or greatly oppose that, because, usually they were the ones taking advantage of its powers over many powerless countries: e,g., bullying, economic sanction, encroaching, isolation. interfering, threatening etc.,etc.,etc.

    Therefore, if the United Nations is further allowed to exist, then, there is no other choice, but by all means, they should provide enforcement powers of the PCA or the Permanent Court of Arbitration that can surpassed the power of any powerful Nation on earth, so no one can boast. Having PCA without the power to enforce its verdict or decisions or proclamation is like a headless chicken.